Why Food Waste Demands Systems Thinking
- Erin Creegan-Dougherty
- Oct 20
- 1 min read
Food waste costs the world over $1 trillion every year—and that price tag barely captures the true impact. When food is wasted, we’ve also wasted land, water, energy, labor, and the chance to nourish people. (Source: UN-FAO / major media reporting)
What Food Waste Signals About Our System
Food waste is a symptom of deeper issues, policy, pricing, and perception often push us toward “all-or-nothing” sustainability, when the real answer is balance—prevention first, smart redistribution next, and only then recycling and recovery.

Why a Systems View Matters
The above info graph is intended to showcase why a systems lens is essential. Food waste doesn’t happen in isolation; it emerges from how we plan production, set standards, price risk, design packaging, forecast demand, and even communicate date labels. A systems view helps us:
- See root causes, not just symptoms (e.g., crop specs, contracts, logistics bottlenecks). 
- Coordinate across the chain, so actions at one node don’t create waste at another. 
- Prioritize interventions by impact, focusing upstream prevention before end-of-pipe fixes. 
Why the Circular Economy Gets So Much Attention
The circular economy translates that systems view into practice. Instead of “take-make-waste,” it aims to:
- Design out waste (smarter specs, flexible grading, modular packaging, right-sizing portions). 
- Keep products and materials in use (secondary markets, upcycling, repair/refill, nutrient cycling). 
- Regenerate natural systems (composting, soil health, water stewardship, biodiversity). 
Applied to food, circularity means aligning forecasts and incentives to prevent surplus, building reliable channels to redistribute edible food, and transforming unavoidable scraps into nutrients and energy—closing loops while improving resilience.



Comments